51 Results

Archive for July, 2009

July 8, 2009

The Titanic As Proof That Women Were Always Advantaged?

So, your reply to sexism against women is to revel in sexism against MEN. That alone shows exactly why women should NOT “rule the world”, because such an attitude shows that you view women as ready for revenge, rather than ready to behave fairly and responsibly towards all people.Oh, you might look up the statistics of the sinking of the Titanic: http://www.anesi.com/titanic.htmYou will see that even 3rd class women outsurvived 1st class men.

Not to mention that ALL classes of women outsurvived 3rd class CHILDREN. And, this at a time when the so called “patriarchy” was at it’s zenith, yet men DIED so that women could LIVE.Thats the truth of the history of men and women throughout all of time. It’s past time for women to get off of their high horses and start to acknowledge that they have always had the better position in life. Quick, how many women died in Vietnam or in the trenches of Verdun ?

Amazon.com: Windust’s review of Why Women Should Rule the World

 

July 8, 2009

Time for a crackdown on sexually provocative dress (does my oogling you OFFEND you?)

They want you to look, but not comment… I say FUCK YOU!… Men are not dimmer switches that you can turn on to indulge your shallow vanity or flatter you ego. Why don’t YOU Control your attention seeking urge…  flaunt your wholeness and show some respect for other people’s right not to be aroused or offended by your nakedness

YouTube – Time for a crackdown on sexually provocative dress

An interesting video by a guy called thugtician. At the moment of writing this, the video is missing as he has abandoned and deleted his youtube account. I want to comment on the point he made, which is to talk about a sense of entitlement some women feel for sexual validation by males.

The video is about how women use sexually provocative dress in a childish manner… Expecting that it only works when they want it to work, and only on the men they want it work. Its about how women actually at times act almost as if men are created for no other purpose than to validate women, and only on women’s terms. If a woman wants to be validated, and men do not check her out or ask her out, then, they are all spineless losers (or so her logic goes). If however, she does not want to be checked out or asked on that day, then all men are perverts for daring to check her out.

The basic idea is this: “You can’t have your cake and eat it too”. A lot of women want to dress provocatively and go out and only get attention by cute guys, but not by the guys who aren’t their type. Its to these women that thugtician said  “FUCK YOU… GROW UP“.

In essence, that is what being an adult is about. Its about realizing that you do not control the world and the world doesn’t revolve around you. In fact, dressing provocatively is not a laser-targeting-precision tool, so do not complain when it doesn’t perform that way. In fact, I believe thugtician’s point was more that women want to use dress as a power-control ploy. As if it were a remote control that controls men’s reactions. As if men are not free-thinking individuals with their own desires and thoughts.

Speaking of sexually provocative dress in the workplace…

The weirdest response I’ve seen to this issue by a chick who was debating Marc Rudov on Fox. She said something to the tune of “well… men dress nicely too!” Considering that Marc Rudov was talking about sexually provocative dress, that was just ridiculous. When was the last time that men went to work in SPANDEX CYCLING PANTS that clearly outline his penis, while he wears a cock ring to keep his cock half hard and has holes cut out to the sides of the penis to display that gap between the balls and the cock?

Did I just pain the weirdest picture for you? Men going to their office job in spandex pants and clearly outlined half-erect penises? Well, actually that would be the equivalent of woman going to work with super-tight outfit, high heels and the push-up bra and the immense cleavage displays.

In fact, a woman’s breasts becoming hard and lifting up is the EQUIVALENT of a men’s dick getting a hard on. That’s how it is in nature. Women’s breasts and nipples get firm when they want to invite a guy to have sex with them. Its just like a guy’s half-erection. Exact equivalent. So goes the bright red lipstick and all the other biological indicators of “come fuck me now” mode.

 

July 8, 2009

Objectify Chicks: The Real Child Abusers

“HHS studies report that ‘children in mother-only households were three times more likely to be fatally abused [murdered] than children in father-only households. Females were 78% of the perpetrators of fatal child abuse [murder] and 81% of natural parents who seriously abuse their children.’”

Objectify Chicks: The Real Child Abusers

This fits the other one, where they’ve found that domestic violence is present in much bigger quantities in female only (lesbian) relationships. If men was the source of domestic violence, then there would be none when he’s not present, right?

 

July 8, 2009

Feminists’ main goal is to raise the "cost of sex"

Feminists seek to raise the ‘costs’ of sex thus, their own inherent value to ultimately control males. Porn is merely one release mechanism as is prostitution which they will eliminate to achieve this.This manifests other societies as attitudes being engineered against polygamy and access to marriage.

YouTube – exposing feminism! interview: Dr. Henry Makow part 1

Such a great point. Its not too hard to see this after studying most of what feminism is doing.

They CLAIM to be about women’s rights and treating women like humans, but HOW MANY of them are out there helping out poor women in poor disctricts? Vs… How many of them are working on “make sex harder to get” issues.

They invest like 10000x more effort in sexual harassment issues and rape issues, then they do in helping poor women climb the ladder.

Right now, they’ve gone so far, as to define rape, any time a woman has sex and she doesn’t like it, and at the same time, they’re working very hard on getting women to hate all men and make them suspicious, weary and distrusting of men.

Its getting harder and harder and harder for men and women to get together. More and more men are becoming misogynistic and more and more women are becoming misandric…

Feminism is like the geeky girl who no one invited to the prom, fighting to have the prom canceled. 

They’ve gone so far as to pretty much outmode any way of men and women getting together. If you go through a feminist list of what they consider to be sexual harassment or domestic violence or date rape… there is no way to not break a rule on that list. The only way to not be a rapist/harasser/abuser by their definitions is to remain celibate.

You think I’m exaggerating? Here’s one of those lists.

* Name-calling or yelling.
* Using angry expressions or gestures.
* Humiliation, either in public or private….
* Accusations of infidelity….
* Constant questioning of the other person’s judgment or decision-making abilities.
* Threatening to leave….
* Ignoring or minimizing the other person’s feelings….
* A desire to have sex for the wrong reasons.
* Insistence that you do things his way.
* Clinging to you constantly….
* Unpredictable behavior.

Here’s a list on how they define sexual harassment:

Behaviors that are always unacceptable include:

  • physical contact that includes touching, pinching, patting, kissing, rubbing up against, fondling, groping, grabbing or assault
  • interfering with or blocking movement
  • verbal sexual advances or propositions
  • suggestive or obscene letters, notes, invitations or email received at work or at home
  • repeated face-to-face, telephone or email invitations after being refused
  • making or using derogatory comments, epithets, slurs and jokes
  • leering, making sexual gestures, displaying sexually suggestive objects or pictures, cartoons or posters
  • verbal abuse of a sexual nature, including graphic comments about an individual’s body, sexually degrading words to describe an individual
  • unwanted sexual advances or attention
  • obscene or suggestive sounds
  • passing over qualified employees for promotion in favor of an employee who is sexually involved with the boss
  • obscene or suggestive gifts
  • frequent discussion of sexual acts and exploits 

The only predisposition for this is, that the people involved work in the same company… If you fullfill ANY OF THESE CRITERIA, you are a harasser… No kidding…

BETWEEN THESE TWO…

1) verbal sexual advances or propositions (Would you go out with me) (I like you, I was wondering if you’re interested in something more)

2) physical contact that includes touching, pinching, patting, kissing, rubbing up against, fondling, groping, grabbing or assault

Is there ANY way left for a man and a woman to get together? If you can’t flirt physically or verbally what way is left?

Now consider this, MOST people and marriages started out in the workplace, for a very simple reason that most adults, its their only place to meet people.

Just like most teenagers meet people in college/high-school/grade-school.

If you make meeting people impossible in the workplace… you pretty much destroy dating in general.

So… whatever, people could just move to meeting strangers right? NO, WRONG. Feminists invented “street harassment” to prevent that from happening. If you so much as dare desire or find attractive a stranger, you’re AGAIN considered a harasser.

Currently street harassment is the act of “making a sexual or romantic advance on a stranger who’s not interested”.

Do you see the problem with this definition? The ONLY WAY to know if someone is interested is BY making an advance!!!! Its a catch 22.

- If you approach a woman, and she likes you (you’re her type), then its ok.

- If a woman likes you, and you don’t approach her (out of fear of harassing her), then you’re a “wuss”  and not a grown up man… And yes, feminists actually give these labels to men who don’t approach women interested in them

-If you’re not a woman’s type, and you approach her, that’s sexual harassment, and you’re a criminal

In other words, the only way to not go wrong is pure luck (any wonder why guys call it “getting lucky)… OR never leave your house. Because just being liked by a woman, and you not advancing (per her wishes)… is also wrong.

 

July 7, 2009

Warren Farell Quotes

Hurt people hurt people. Period.

Men are often a lot less vindictive than women are, because we are rejected constantly every day.

Warren Farrell

Men don’t oppress women any more than women oppress men.

Warren Farrell

The only men who aren’t in fear of women’s reactions are usually men who aren’t born or who are dead.

Warren Farrell

For example, the equivalent of a woman being treated as a sex object is a man being treated as a success object.

Warren Farrell