On the other hand however, a lot of the studies on hookups show a very direct link between a man’s muscularity (v-taper) and the number of sexual partners. In fact, the shape that’s ideally sexy to women, the 1.6 V-ratio also happens to be the natural muscular peak for most men. If you don’t know what 1.6 guy looks like, see guy in the picture at bottom.

That literally means you have to have the conditioning and muscularity of a natural bodybuilding champion to get as much attention as an average skinny chick. That means busting your ass off and punishing your body daily for 5-6 years, without fail, consistently and without excuses. This all assuming you are also shredded and have no bodyfat on you (you actually have to eat less food than a skinny chick, while punishing your body like a pro).

To that you might respond “oh well, but that’s just the ideal body, can’t you just be moderately fit and get physical attention from women?”. Well, from my personal experience and that of most people in the adonis community – physical attraction seems to start in the 1.55 range. In fact, it seems to be sudden… When you’re a 1.4 or 1.45 guy, women don’t even check you out in that physical way. And then, when you get to a 1.5 taper, women all of a sudden start checking you out and approaching you in that physical way. But still, even getting to a 1.5 range still involves 3-4 years of busting your ass in the gym.

Now, you might be going “but alek, I don’t even exercise, and women approach, hit on me and check me out”. And to that I would respond “Well I did too even before I got buff”. In fact, even when I was chubby I managed to get a high-level of female attention. I had developed my confidence and charisma so much that women were checking me out, approaching me, bumping into me, rubbing my crotch in clubs and swooning – even though I was below average physically. So I definitely know the power of “inner game” and behaviour-based attraction. I had personally achieved a level of female attention and attraction that even most naturally cute guys don’t get.

Here’s the difference though, all of that attraction back then was personality-based. I was getting female attention and attraction on a personal, not physical level. Anyone who tells you that looks don’t matter is full of shit, and has never seen the difference that a change in physique makes. It’s only when you transform your physique that you GET how differently women respond to athletic men. The kinds of checking out that I get right now is PHYSICAL in nature. In fact, today I can be in the worst and crappiest mental state, and women still check me out AS IF i’m charismatic or “on”. Before, I had to be “on” and “in state” to get attention from women. Today all I need to do is leave the house.

And it’s not just that being 1.55 lowers the confidence and personality requirements – the checking out is completely different. I don’t think I can describe it in words, but trust me, it’s different. Women literally check you out in a PHYSICAL way. You literally feel that they’re checking you out as a physical package. It’s not the same kind of “vibe” that you get when women check you out for being the most charismatic guy in the room.

That said, the truth is, a lot of the weird, bad and confusing behaviour that men encounter with women is in fact a lot of the time based on the woman messing up or self-sabotaging her interaction with the man. It’s not always bitchiness. A lot of the time it comes out of her being insecure. For some reason a lot men are unable to see insecurity in women and assume women do everything on purpose. Men seem to assume women know exactly what they’re doing, but that’s just not the case a lot of the time.

The same is true in reverse. Do you realize, do you have any idea that very often if a woman sends you (what she thinks are obvious signals of interest) and you don’t ask her out, she assumes you’re an asshole? I’m not kidding. It never even crosses her mind that you have all these insecurities too. You’re thinking “Omg, was that a signal, oh wait, what if she laughs at me if I ask her out?”, “what if people think I’m a creep for talking to her”. Yet, she interprets your non-approach as “Who the fuck does he think he is? He thinks he’s too good for me huh? My boobs aren’t big enough for him to approach me? Well fuck him, shallow asshole!”

Men and women both do it as a general rule. Men misread women’s insecurity-based actions as being malicious and bitchy. Women read a lot of men’s insecure behaviour as being asshollery.

Here’s an article aimed at women… It’s pretty interesting… It’s teaching women how to not fuck up when a guy approaches them.

From: http://iveronicawalsh.wordpress.com/2010/08/14/why-dont-men-ask-me-out-on-dates-a-cbt-view/

So – you haven’t had a boyfriend for a long time?

You get hit on sometimes, but men don’t ask you out on dates?

You think it’s not fair, as you know that you’re smarter or prettier or more stylish or whatever than other women you see in relationships?

Maybe you think that men are ‘useless’, or that it’s impossible to meet a man in your city?

Mallery and Tina are good friends. They make great efforts to look attractive. They go out every week. They dress up and go to popular bars, and locate a nice prominent place to sit – having a few drinks, chatting, and silently hoping that they’ll meet a man – and be invited out for dinners and treated like a princess – and live happily ever after… But neither of them ever do.

Okay – let’s take a peek at one of their nights out:

• They’re sitting at the bar of a popular pub on a Thursday night. It’s quite busy. Lots of men in suits! Yay!
• One drink down. Another drink down. Chit chat, chit chat. Not totally paying attention to each other, heads swivelling to check out the talent…
• Yesss! Two men take seats at the bar. They’re good looking, they’re well dressed. They’re chatting to each other, but DEFINITELY giving sneaky glances to the girls. Happy days!
• Mallory: ‘Don’t look now, but they’re totally looking at us‘. Tina: ‘I know! What do you think? *giggle and nudge*
• After a short time, the men turn their chairs and make an approach – ‘Hello ladies, are you having a good night?’ *smiles*

NOW – here’s where it gets interesting – let’s take a look inside the girls heads - we’ll check out their THINKING, and how those thoughts make them FEEL, and how those feelings affect their BODIES, and how all of this affects their BEHAVIOUR. Let’s go:

white word

Mallory

Thinking – ‘This fella really fancies me. Do I want him as a boyfriend? Would I be proud to show him off? Does he match up with my LIST? What does he work at? Where does he live? Uh oh, he’s being a bit of an idiot. Is he nervous? What’s wrong with him to be single at his age anyway? Oh, I wonder if he’s got a child from a previous relationship! Oh, that’ll be really messy. And the ex would always be around too… Sigh. So maybe I’ll give him my number, maybe I’ll kiss him goodnight – I might date him, but he’s far from perfect.

• Feeling – Aggressive, annoyed
• Physiological -muscles tensing, shaky, feeling light headed
• Behaviour – bullets a series of questions as if she’s interviewing him, pulling faces and rolling her eyes when she feels he’s ‘being an idot’, mocks him none too gently – eventually launching into her oft repeated ‘charming’ speel of ‘are you out tonight looking for a woman? what kind of woman? what’s wrong with men around here? what do you all want? You’re all useless, no offence. Men are just looking to get laid aren’t they?’… While being generally pompous and pouty (trying to be all sexy and cool).

 

Tina

Thinking – ‘I have to make this guy fancy me. I need him to think I’m lovely and be into me. Oh, am I making a fool of myself here? I am. Why did I say that? It sounded stupid. Does he like me? No he thinks I’m an idiot. He’s not really coming on to me like he did at the beginning. He’s being a bit flippant. He’s not attracted to me now he can see me close up. I’m boring him. Is he looking over at those other girls?  He is. He’s not really impressed here. I’m messing this up.’

• Feeling – anxious, nervy, shy
• Physiological – tummy butterflies, shaky, heat rising in her face, heart beating fast, breathing quickening
• Behaviour – not saying too much, not really concentrating on what he’s saying and engaging with it, giggling at pretty much everything he says even when it’s not appropriate. Goes to the ladies room a few minutes after they first approach to touch up her makeup. Comes back and continues the giggling. Giggle, giggle, giggle… a little too loud, too often.

white word

Okay - can you see how the same event elicits different thinking from the women? So it’s not the event or situation that causes the feelings and behaviour, that only influences it, it’s the thinking that causes it.

How was it self-sabotaging? Well, not only were the girls not particularly enjoying it or feeling good – THE MEN BECAME UNCOMFORTABLE TOO – AND THEY MADE THEIR EXCUSES AND LEFT - and, not for the first time, the girls were left a bit dazed – where did they go? what? (Mallory thinks ‘what is wrong with him, he’s an idiot!, while Tina thinks ‘what is wrong with me, I’m an idiot!) – but they dealt with it by telling each other the guys were rubbish, ‘hahahaaa, as if we’d be interested in the likes of them, as if! If we’d been into them we could have had them.. yeah‘ Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear… Let’s take a look at this…

• Dismissing someone’s comments because he’s bitter because he can’t get laid is like dismissing the owner of a crappy car when he complains that the car is a piece of shit. DUH, when else are you supposed to complain, when the car runs well? The most natural response to a crappy situation is to complain about it, so if a guy complains about women because he “can’t get laid” then maybe, just maybe it’s because there are many women who create situations which make it very difficult to meet or hook up with them, and hence they are crappy. A good indicator of their crappyness is that you can’t get anywhere with them, from a simple hello to getting a date, to having sex.

• We are all descended from twice as many women as men. There’s a statistic measured from genetic data that 80% of women historically passed on their genes, but only 40% of men did. This means that we are descended from the most “fit” men, and men walking around today are themselves descended from the most alpha men. So it’s ridiculous when PUAs say how inept the vast majority of men are when it comes to meeting women, since modern men can only be descended from the most sexually successful men of the past. This is a very under appreciated and unacknowledged fact about men. So it is absurd when PUAs say that the average man supposedly has so much to learn when it comes to meeting women, and that acting “normal” just doesn’t cut it with the modern woman. This is in direct odds with the fact that the male ancestors of the average man did just fine acting “normal”. The truth is that women, especially attractive western women, have become more narcissistic and demanding than their historical birthright would dictate, so to these women it only seems that very few men are good enough for them, when in fact their ancestral genetic record indicates otherwise. Hence, raising the bar on what men should deliver in order to please the modern woman is completely artificial, let alone ridiculous.

• Sex is something men buy and women sell, which is an economic representation of the history of male and female relations.But in times past the seller respected the buyer much more than today, and the system was much more functional.However, in the modern dating scene in western societies, the buyer-seller model still applies, but is cleverly disguised with fake courtship rituals and relationship quid pro quo, with the added insult that the sellers (the women) often disrespect the buyers (the men).It’s like walking into a store, and instead of being greeted by the merchant you are ignored, and even scorned just for being there. You are starting from a negative position which you must climb out of somehow. In other words, you have to prove yourself worthy before even ATTEMPTING to buy.

• Men, at least in this part of the world, lack backbone with women. The degree to which women have gotten the upper hand is not a testament to the strength of women, but to the weakness of men. In fact, it is very easy to recognize when a woman is scheming or manipulative, but it is only that men are so easily blinded by their sexual impulses that women are allowed to get away with what they do.

• Western women always say they want confident men, but when you confidently approach a woman in a public venue she brushes you off with the cold shoulder, and that’s because it is a social taboo to meet strangers in public. But really, it takes a lot of balls to cold approach someone in public, which is precisely what women say they want in a man. Unfortunately, such behaviour is not rewarded, no matter how gutsy it is. So in actual fact, women are only receptive to meeting “confident” men who operate within societies guidelines and restraints, which usually means meeting someone through their peer group, which is a chicken shit standard a man must adhere to in order to meet women.

• In the west, men hating on women is mostly a response to their shitty behaviour towards men.But women hating on men is mostly due to their indoctrination and socially downloaded negative programming towards men.

• If a woman flakes on you and you call her on it she will become very upset, not because you’re falsely accusing her, but because in her mind you cannot possibly know that her flake excuse is bogus. So she’s upset at your arrogance at assuming something to be true when you have no proof, and it doesn’t matter that you are in fact right.

• Being picky is not a virtue. So many women act like being highly selective is a good thing, so it’s almost as if, to them,the act of rejecting is done just to feel better about themselves.This is certainly true in club environments where many women see men as bowling pins which you can knock down for self-esteem points.

• The fact that women are “everywhere” does not necessarily mean that your odds of meeting them will increase, just like having more people witness someone in distress will not necessarily mean that the odds of someone helping will increase. In fact, the exact opposite happens. This is known as the Bystander Effect, a proven yet counterintuitive phenomenon.

• In magazines and in online articles which show a picture of a man and woman, such as in a relationship context, the man is often shown looking at the woman while the woman is shown looking at the camera. This basically means that the man’s focus is on her, while her focus is on the camera. It’s almost as if the man is shown as an accessory to make her look good.

• Some men don’t like prostitutes because the woman doesn’t actually like them, and is just doing it for money.To me that wouldn’t matter, anymore than I would care if my mechanic likes me as a person. As long as he can properly service my car, that’s all I really want. I’m not paying him to like me.I’m paying him to service my car, the same way I would pay a woman to satisfy me sexually. However, I would want her to respect me. That is important, the same way it’s important that my mechanic respects my wishes with respect to my car.

• When men complain about hard to meet women they are often called whiny or defeatist. But the defeatist argument is often used as a shield against deeper and more truthful examinations. And it’s also a double standard to accuse men of being negative or defeatist when they complain about unapproachable hard to meet women. What about all the women who walk around with cold bitchy looks on their faces. Aren’t they being negative and self-defeating too? How can you expect to meet someone when you carry around a fuck-off vibe?But when men refuse to approach these women because of their bad vibe they are the ones who are accused of being defeatist or lacking boldness.

• From my own experience, a woman who doesn’t open up quickly is a lost cause. Yes it’s possible to get some kind of positive response from her using wit and funny banter (such as by using PUA material), but unless she decides from the get-go that she wants to know you better you are wasting your time and you will get no where with her. Another point to make is that it is 10x easier for someone to make themselves approachable than it is for you to approach someone who is unapproachable. As a result, the burden should be on women to make themselves approachable rather than men having to overcome their resistance to being approached. So it makes no sense to approach a woman who avoids eye contact and has a fuck-off vibe.

• Attractive white anglo women are generally the worst. They are the British inspired, stiff upper lip, snooty, cliquish, stone-faced women whom the media sees as the gold standard of beauty. They are icy and cold in their demeanor and are highly adept at ignoring the shit out of you, especially if you’re a man. You can almost marvel at this ability they have to completely and consistently ignore men in public, but only if you think in terms of how hard it would be for you (a man) to do the same thing towards them. The truth is that it’s not an ability they have but rather a lack of something which enables them to treat men as invisible as well as they do. You can call it a lack of wonder, or even curiosity about the opposite sex, which is replaced instead with total indifference. This is hardly an ability worth crowing about in my book. So we shouldn’t act so amazed at their ability to do this any more than we should marvel at the ability of a hamster to keep running on it’s wheel for hours on end. It’s nothing more than a symptom of a weak non-curious mind.

• Men have their faults too, no doubt. But when modern westernized women complain about men it mostly comes across as higher quality complaints about problems that you encounter when you already have the upper hand, and those below you are not measuring up to your standards. It is not that different from how a royal would complain about the misbehaviour of his subordinates and servants – oh look, they dropped the fruit tray again, those idiots. If you look closely at the general complaints men and women have about each other the following pattern emerges:

Women’s complaints are generally that men don’t measure up in some way. For example, all he wants to do is drink beer and watch sports, or he did X when he should have done Y. The complaints are often just vague descriptions, with not too much detail, and with focus on men’s shortcomings (real or perceived).

Men’s complaints are generally that they can’t connect with women, that they aren’t given the time of day, that they can’t make progress, that they aren’t meeting women’s expectations, that they aren’t getting positive responses despite putting in the effort.

Women’s complaint format: “He’s not good enough”.

Men’s complaint format: “No matter what I do I’m not good enough”.

One group is focused on self-improvement and the other isn’t.One group is forced to be introspective, and the other isn’t.Therefore, which group is most likely to be humbled and realistic in their expectations?Which group is most likely to gain feelings of entitlement and narcissism?

But they’re not done yet. They’ve now invented a new excuse to justify the scum known as rebecca. They now say that being a scummy intolerant piece of shit is ok if you’re a woman, and the person you’re bigoted towards is a man. Why? Well, because apparently, men are physically larger, and women are physically smaller, and that makes it ok to engage in bigotry if you’re female.

Well, this excuse made me come up with an analogy that demonstrates very clearly why this size-excuse is an abysmal failure. In fact, I decided to use this analogy to retell the story of Rebecca Twatson and elevator gate. Let’s substitute Rebecca Twatson with skinny heterosexual white man, and let’s substitute elevator guy with a black, tall bodybuilder. The size dynamic there would be equivalent to the size dynamic in the original elevator-gate.

Ok, so imagine this analogy:

-> You have this guy Michael. He is a heterosexual white guy…

-> Michael gets approached in an elevator by a tall professional gay black bodybuilder who’s 5 inches taller and hypermuscular.

-> The gay bodybuilder propositions to Michael in a very polite manner. Michael says he’s not interested. The gay bodybuilder apologizes, and moves on.

-> Michael than gets on the internet, and says “Listen up you homosexuals, don’t proposition us heterosexuals in elevators, that’s creepy and threatening you homos”

Everyone would agree that michael’s internet rant is homophobia and a form of hate speech and unfair, especially since the gay bodybuilder was super polite and non-threatening.

-> Let’s say that Michael’s gay-hating defenders now started excusing Michael’s homophobia by starting to give out random homophobic “stats” about “how much of prison rape is done by gay men”. Let’s say that Michael’s defenders started trying to defend Michael’s homophobic rant by saying things like “do you know how much of pedophilia is done by gay men to little boys”. 

-> Let’s say that Michael (and his homophobic defenders) now started trying to justify Michael’s homophobia by telling you that the problem was that the gay man “cornered michael in an elevator”.  They say things like “It was the homo’s fault” coz he “cornered a heterosexual”. Then, these Michael defenders start saying shit like “We heterosexuals often feel threatened by them homosexuals, so if we’re in confined space with one, we don’t know if we can escape if the gay dude happens to be a rapist… Gay dudes should give us space, sheesh… We just want to protect ourselves from homosexuals who are rapists”

-> Let’s say that finally, Michael’s defenders started trying to defend Michael’s obvious homophobia by inventing some “size dynamic theory”. They now start talking about how “black bodybuilders are much taller and muscular“ and they “could easily tackle and rape heterosexuals”.  Imagine these people saying that Michael was “justified” in his homophobic statements, and it’s really“the fault of the gay guy for propositioning Michael in the wrong place and time”.

-> Imagine if everyone now tried to hush up Michael’s homophobia by just repeating the following phrase to people pointing out Michael’s homophobia -> “the black guy was just a CREEPY gay dude, stop defending creepiness! Stop defending gays who are so creepy that they don’t know the proper way to treat straights, sheesh, all ya gay-defenders are so dumb“

-> Further, imagine Michael’s defenders start saying shit like “It’s the responsibility of gay dudes to learn not to make us heterosexuals uncomfortable“, “Let’s face it, that gay dude was out of line, and he picked the wrong place to talk to a heterosexual“, “We heterosexuals have the right to feel comfortable and not fear rape from them gay dudes”, “It is the responsibility of homos to care about our heterosexual concerns and not pick the wrong locations before they address a heterosexual”

Not only would Michael’s supporters not convince us that Michael is not homophobic, they’d even further confirm our suspicion that Michael’s statement WAS in fact homophobic, as are all of Michael’s supporters

You might notice that my analogy is an EXACT paralel to what happened in the Rebecca Twatson case. Miss Twatson IS Michael, and her supporters are the supporters from my analogy.

If you want to succeed with women in ANY way,
there is something MASSIVE you need to
understand before anything else.

It’s crucial to understand the REASON there
is such a problem out there with women to
BEGIN with.

The reason is both SIMPLE yet it also
is something that virtually NO ONE
sees, and NO ONE discusses.

Everyone thinks it’s just “natural” that
women and men will just have the
war of the sexes, etc.

That is HOGWASH!

The REAL reason there is a problem
is simple, yet elusive to everyone:

WOMEN WHO ARE EVEN REMOTELY
ATTRACTIVE ARE BRAINWASHED TO
BE SPOILED.

That’s it, that’s the bottom line.

Men are not spoiled the same way, because
men tend to achieve value through a NUMBER
of things, so a guy who is “good-looking” knows
he has to be more than that to be “desirable”,
so guys are in general less spoiled this way.

(That’s why female supermodels are celebrities and
mult-millionaires, but nobody even knows the NAME
of any male models, not even women know them!)

That’s why, again, women who are even REMOTELY
attractive, are brainwashed to be spoiled
because the only thing they HEAR all
day and all night is how WONDERFUL
they are, and how FANTASTIC of
a PRIZE THEY ARE, no matter what
is REALLY the truth!

Also, all this is really true for OUR generation.
It’s not really true for your MOM’s generation.

This is the first generation where many
young women have NEVER KNOWN a
world where attractive women were
NOT WORSHIPPED!!!!!!!!!

It’s not politically correct to STAND UP
to these lies either, so the lies go
unchallenged and thus they get
more and more reinforced in women’s
and even some men’s minds as well!

Here’s how women are spoiled:

1. The PHYSICAL deterrent of man
is diminished.

Now, obviously, I am against any kind of
abuse. The fact is, men and women
have checks and balances in power,
when in nature.

Men are stronger physically, but they
also will SACRIFICE themselves for
the woman they love, the family,
etc, etc.

In return, a woman gave her loyalty,
etc, etc.

Today, however, a man must act
EXTRA NICE AND ON TIPPY TOES
otherwise his VOICE tonality alone
will be used against him, in false
accusations of assault, threat, abuse,
harassment, etc.

So a man can’t even BE a man, he has
to IGNORE his own testosterone.

He has to symbolically cut his balls off
when he is communicating with women.

Meanwhile, women can hurt men emotionally,
they can get the police after him even when
he is innocent, they can do all sorts of
HORRORS that our culture tends to
STILL believe women rather than men
even with zero evidence!

This SPOILS a woman, into thinking
it’s NORMAL for a man to have to
kiss up and almost FEAR women
but for women to NOT FEAR men
at all, knowing the legal system
will always fall on her side.

2. THE MEDIA INFLATES WOMEN’S EGOS

Because it’s not politically correct to
stick to the TRUTH, what we get instead
are ENDLESS programs, magazines,
sitcoms, commercials, etc, all aimed
at WOMEN that tell women the following
things:

That COUGARS are actually more desirable
than young women.

So you get women who were not only
spoiled their entire YOUTHS, but are
now told they are even MORE desirable
now that they are OLDER.

Imagine a girl who has been flattered and
kissed up to her whole life for her looks,
and is now being told she is even BETTER
than before.

The reality is that of course, cougars are
not physically more attractive than younger
women. They are less, but this truth is
COVERED up and instead replaced with
a massive lie, which just makes women
more spoiled with men.

Here’s another example:

The INFINITE sitcoms on TV where the
man has NO BRAINS, and is desperately
craving sex with his wife, while the wife
is far SMARTER and not too keen on
sex with her husband.

Here’s another:

The ENDLESS commercials for products
for women, telling them how GREAT
they are, and that “they’re worth it.”

Meanwhile, commercials for men tend
to show the guy being ELATED when
any girl wants to talk to him, and in
fact it’s quite normal for commercials
to show women rejecting guys.

There’s one commercial with a guy
filling up his car at the gas station,
he strikes up a chat with the woman
nearby, who is also filling up her
car at the same time as him.

He asks her, “You come here often?”
and she says “Actually, no!,” and she
just TAKES OFF in her fuel efficient car,
rather than talk with the guy.

THIS IS ALL NORMAL, the guy is
supposed to EXPECT this MASSIVE
rudeness even though HE put himself
in the way of emotional risk by talking
to her first.

And it’s not like the guy in the commercial
looks like he is uncool or anything, which
PROVES how it’s totally NOT ABOUT
YOUR LOOKS, you can be a MALE
SUPERMODEL and STILL GET
ABUSE FROM MOST OF TODAY’S
WOMEN, if they are even REMOTELY
ATTRACTIVE.

No protests from any man’s group in
the streets for this kind of thing.

Men aren’t allowed to complain, they
have to be happy with this.

Sex and the City pretends that these
women who are all aging and looking
horrible for real, are ACTUALLY
such hot things, and who are living
the exciting free for all sex life.

Every cool girl I’ve ever met so far
absolutely HATES Sex and the City.

It’s almost become a test you can give
women, if they hate Sex and the City
or if they don’t even know much about
what the show is (which is even better
as it means they never even gravitated
toward it in the first place), they are
probably a better type of girl.

But of course, in our society, it’s MEN
who are the dirty, superficial, evil, physically
and emotionally abusive ones, as well as
just plain stupid ones.

It’s the men who actually die in the
wars, make up the majority of fire-fighters,
who sacrifice themselves for women,
but THIS isn’t mentioned in the media.

Nope, instead, we get MOVIES where
some woman kicks every guy’s ass.

And of course, it’s STILL men who tend
to pay for dates, and who must risk
rejection by approaching women,
never the other way around.

So OF COURSE all this results in
women being more spoiled than
men.

They will say hurtful things and push
their luck as far as you will allow them.

It’s not even their FAULT anymore,
I totally MEAN this, not just being
“nice” here when I say that, it’s
NOT WOMEN’S FAULT ANYMORE
BECAUSE THEY ARE TOTALLY
BRAINWASHED, BUT IT IS YOUR
JOB AS A MAN TO NEVER ACCEPT
THIS TREATMENT FROM ANY
WOMAN—–THIS IS THE ONLY
WAY TO CHANGE IT FOR YOURSELF.

When it comes to how most women today
who are even remotely attractive view men,
these women are like children who
had TERRIBLE parents who just let
them get away with EVERYTHING.

Most of these women feel it’s all NORMAL,
they don’t feel any reason to stop what they
are doing.

HENCE, the reason why it’s SO IMPORTANT
TO HOLD ONTO YOUR POWER AND NOT
TO GIVE IT AWAY.

What happens with most men is they
meet a woman, the woman is insensitive
or demanding or whatever, and the guy
just GIVES INTO IT, in order to KEEP
her, when in reality this just DRIVES
HER AWAY.

It drives her away because she doesn’t
appreciate that which she didn’t have
to earn.

It drives her away because she is so used
to those kinds of guys it’s boring for her.

TIP 1:

HOLD ONTO YOUR POWER

Don’t give away your power, and by
power I mean your emotions, your time,
your money, your energy, until a woman
has EARNED them from you.

TIP 2:

SLOW DOWN, DON’T RACE TO THE SACK

Slow down the interaction, most guys
want to get naked so fast, and this only
reads as desperation.

Instead, slow down and TALK to her,
get to know who she is, let her know
you have standards, and more importantly
ACTUALLY HAVE STANDARDS.

If she doesn’t meet your standards, reject her.
99% of the time, this only makes you more
attractive and make her pursue you more.

But you have to be willing to really walk away.

TIP 3:

NEVER GO OVERBOARD

Don’t go to extremes and don’t become
abusive yourself, just because she says
something screwed up isn’t a reason
for you to become abusive yourself,
INSTEAD just freeze frame and stop
the conversation and let her know why
you are getting up to leave.

This way, you lead by example.
As Mao Tse Tung said “Respond
intelligently even to unintelligent
treatment.”

TIP 4:

STEAL HER PERSPECTIVE

Most women have the perspective
of being the one who is more
desired, and most men FEED
this by calling incessantly and
asking dorky insecure questions
and trying to qualify themselves.

If a woman doesn’t like something
about you, or teases you about something,
IT’S CRUCIAL you take her frame,
so you should just say back to her:

“If that’s how you feel” and let her
walk away—99% of the time she
won’t, or she would not have been
talking to you in the first place,
she is just spoiled and needs
a real man to put her in her place
but not with threats, rather with
your ULTRA SECURE response’
of “if that’s how you feel” and
don’t say a WORD after that
and WATCH how she will fill
in the void to keep the conversation
going.

And always be just A BIT more busy
than she is, a bit less time for
a relationship than she has,
a bit less everything, and the
REASON for this is that
every good deed you do for her
in terms of having so much time
and energy for her is partially
read by her as desperation by
her, so your good actions
count MORE when done
sparingly. This can
CHANGE once she shows
she respects you.

This guy’s explanations are interesting, but his solution seems too gamey to me… Still sounds like “game” or like a “pua” thing. It’s still something you do, and it still involves too much thinking about what to do and say from a perspective of doing the “attractive thing”. Here’s a simpler solution:
http://aleknovy.com/2011/07/18/the-anti-game-method-if-you-hate-game-and-find-it-incompatible-with-mra-and-matriarchy-fighting/

While all the reasonings they give hold some “logic” to them in the relative sense, overall – you still kind feel iffy about them trying to explain away such immense and amazing super-privilege. It almost feels insulting at some levels when women try to explain that being able to get laid by just existing isn’t all that great. It almost feels insulting when women try to explain that getting dates by just existing and occasionally smiling – isn’t that great. YEAH RIGHT, WANNA TRADE? lol.

The best analogy

It’s like Paris Hilton explaining to a starving Ethiopian that food abundance isn’t that great. She explains that yes, it’s “nice” that you can have 5000 calories of the best tasting food on the planet anytime you want at the snap of your fingers- BUT, it’s actually  a bad thing for her (poor paris) because she’s trying to stay skinny (poor thing) and having all this food abundance isn’t that great most of the time. Sometimes she even wishes she lived in ethiopia.

Or as the RealPeterman puts it:

[Women say:] “Hot guys have their standards.”

Who cares? The issue isn’t “can you get your absolute fondest wish fulfilled whenever you want”, it’s “can you get *something* whenever you want?” If a starving person said to me “you’re lucky, your country is full of food” it would be pretty silly of me to respond with “so what? I can’t afford filet mignon with a bottle of 50-year-old wine.”

TyphonBlue’s first post stuck out to me as a reminder of a common double-standard of thinking: the notion that, while men “just don’t understand” women, nonetheless many women think they know full well what it’s like to be a man and how men think. I never accepted this; after all, how COULD a woman know what a man’s perspective and experience are really like, any more than I could know hers? But TyphonBlue gives the answer: what women are perceiving is the outlook of MASCULINITY, which is culturally communicated. They don’t know what it’s like to BE a man; but they can piece together what our culture EXPECTS of a man, because anyone can see that for themselves. An interesting distinction.