You are describing some methodologies which have the purpose of getting one more pussy.

It is official. You are in fact retarded.

I would have said you lack reading comprehension, but that would be hard considering the fact that I spelled out several times that this is not a strategy to “get more women”. It’s fucking printed and shouted out that you should do this even if it (theoretically) got you “less pussy”.

See how fucking brainwashed your gamer zombies are? You actually read a text that gives a systematic way of better acting on one’s MRA values regardless of success. It even specifically spells out why it should be done even if it “decreases success rate”. You fucking come on here and actually MANAGE TO READ into it a suggestion of “getting more pussy”. Your fucking gamer brain is so warped that you actually manage to read words that don’t exist on the page. Your mind is so obsessed with pussy and not having pussy-independent self-worth, that even a text that talks about not caring about getting pussy, you manage to read as a “technique for getting pussy” How fucking screwed are you?

At not one single fucking point does it say or claim that this methodology increases amount of pussy gotten. It says that it increases your contribution to a better world for men. In fact, I specifically say all the time that NOTHING increases success rates. You have the same success rate no matter what you do. It’s always amount of approaches (filtered through context) that will dictate what you get. Everyone using every method gets the EXACT SAME success rate. The one thing I consistently and always say is that it’s a numbers game and THERE IS nothing you can do on a short-term basis to improve the percentage. There is no way of talking, walking or acting that changes the success rates. They’re always the same against placebo.

Learn to read next time.

P.S.

http://www.seductionmyth.com/just_prove_it/

If you want to defend your cult, please go here. The challenge has been thrown for anyone to prove they get better than placebo (better than numbers-game) results. Nobody has ever taken on the challenge. All game discussions have officially been diverted there. There’s people on there who are far more tolerant of your brainwashed drugged up kind.

Also, fuckholes like DeAngelo make enough money off of guillible little zombies like you every year. In fact, the fucking asshole could comission a 100 studies a year to prove his claims of creating attraction or that one can produce better than number-sgame results. Why does he or anyone in the seduction-cult-industry ever scientifically validate their claims?

http://www.seductionmyth.com/just_prove_it/the-experiment/

The reason is that this blog is sucking up way too much of my time and I’m a very, very busy guy and I keep getting flooded with comments and questions. I never intended for this blog to become read, it was always meant as my own personal clipboard, but way too many people discovered it and eventually I found myself writing for others and also responding to comments. I’m converting it back to it’s initial concept, which was as a tumblr-style clipboard or tumblog.

Your comment is probably officially the last comment on this blog, lol, since I just found way to to disable comments on all old blogs at once too. Thanks.

Alek Novy you write some interesting stuff but I can sense you have some emotional instability about your involvement with what you call “game” – proof of that is that now you just called a guy an idiot when he made totally valid point.

I state it clear: WHAT YOU CALL ANTI-GAME IS GAME. You are describing some methodologies which have the purpose of getting one more pussy. YOU ARE ECNOURAGING INSTRUMENTAL BEHAVIOUR TOWARD WOMEN. You just wrote “how to do shit” guide. This is pure game. And your “method” is intended to be more time and “emotionally” effective. heh. props for that.

Now the manipulation technic you are using here is called changing or moving of meaning (not sure the proper name, im not english native). It’s described very well in Orwell’s 1984 novel.

I really dont know if you are that ignorant or just try to delude ppl on purpose.

“In ANTI-game you believe that YOU have value and go around and judge women’s worth and behaviour.”
Fucking great. Thanks for telling me what I should believe – this believe is instrumentally more effective so I will start using it ! Love you bro !

DUDE you cant start believing something because you want to ! You cant “want to believe”. You may only question your believes and turn toward other believes or someone questions them and then convinces you. But if someone have low self esteem you cant fucking tell him “hey start believe you have value and you are good to go”. This is one of the most retarted self-help, NLP etc concepts EVER.

I would also say you might have some misogynistic attitudes in this article but im too bored to prove that. Just my thought is that it might be coming from a position of low success with women.

While there are sexually frustrated women what data, survey, study, poll, survey states that is the average or majority?

What study is there that states they’re not?

Asking for studies on stuff that doesn’t get studied is somewhat manipulative.

There are lots of sexually frustrated men and women because not everyone gets the sex they want with who they want when they want it.

It’s a bit irrational to portray it as a feedback loop started by women or stemming from women increasing their standards.

Why specifically is it irrational to claim that timeline?

The women’s sexual revolution happened first. Women changed first. Women started increasing their standards first. In the past women were expected to marry the first half-decent guy who showed interest in them.

But women changed, they started refusing to just marry any old joe, and heck, even so much as even talk to joes that aren’t “qualified” enough to be “allowed” to court her.

Men started changing and deciding to no longer court women only recently. So yes, women started it. Women threw away their roles first. Men are only now starting to try to throw away their roles.

Both men and women were unchanged for millenia. It was women who changed first, and you know it. Men are responding only today, several decades after women changed.

After all why put that effort into getting something you don’t really want. It’s no different from your post of guys increasingly seeing it’s not worth the effort to get sex or a have a gf via the pint system. The woman is they are lacking or have no interest because of your idea that they aren’t getting the sex they want from the types they desire may see it as why bother pursuing what you don’t want.

While there are sexually frustrated women what data, survey, study, poll, survey states that is the average or majority?

There are lots of sexually frustrated men and women because not everyone gets the sex they want with who they want when they want it. It’s a bit irrational to portray it as a feedback loop started by women or stemming from women increasing their standards.

I specifically said that I am ONLY talking about the guys who DO act nice.

“But alek, they don’t act nice”

Well whoever is being genuine and not acting IS NOT MY SUBJECT. I am not talking about them.

The alpha cad who they are sleeping with, he is probably awesome at pussy begging, and can change his behaviour on a whim to get pussy.

Oh, so you’re one of those brainwashed gamers are you?

There is no such thing as an “alpha cad”. That’s gamer mythology, not actual human reality. There’s no such thing as “alphas” in the human species.

And if you mean guys who get laid more often than average – then I would disagree. The higher up you go on the chain of guys getting laid, the more genuine they are. Either more genuinely assholish, or genuinely charismatic or even genuinely nerdy.

Your entire sentence is not you speaking, but you dictating out gamer mythology… Game-crap is based on selling you the notion that you need to consciously change behavior to get women or that such a thing even works.

The thing is, even as a male most of these nice guys are pretty nice. They’ll buy you drinks, are polite, turn up on time, compliment you. They may act a bit nicer to women (some pussy begging), but not much. Pussy begging is not an amazing tactic for getting sex, but it’s better than being nice because that’s their nature. They are not acting.

The alpha cad who they are sleeping with, he is probably awesome at pussy begging, and can change his behaviour on a whim to get pussy. And they adore it. They criticize nice guys for something they don’t do much and love guys who are really good at it and do it a lot.